|
镜框流道设计与进浇位置之仿真分析
# O! Y) U/ Y* W2 H$ j3 v4 rSimulation of the runner and gate design for eyeglass frame
; y7 ?8 x& Z( j" P# a& w7 s: L% X
6 _+ M. d' e; l9 I) L刘佳营 、萧宏玮 、杜秋慧 、萧乃仁
. v+ k$ E/ y: y5 p8 Z \Chia-Ying Liu1,Hung-Wei Hsiao1 , Chiu-Hui Tu 2 , Nai-ren Hsiao32 Q7 Y, t& [' E ~$ `
! s( I* _/ \: U8 a. Z# r1 南台科技大学机械工程系副教授
, I' w& ?. g5 ~/ U I$ E" gDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University7 N: r$ ?. A$ \# z/ R
2 南台科技大学机械工程系研究生- T% p4 t7 C6 x6 a W
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University
6 D+ a9 I! V* z: E, _% }1 ^3 中华医事科技大学职业安全卫生系讲师5 Q; @* |4 G1 G
Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology% K' ?# p; Y; q. U q" A
4 科盛科技股份有限公司 Core Tech System Co., Ltd
" S) B; k) e9 ^# T" w& \) I
8 W: O* A6 V( A. y# e; t2 W中文摘要
4 q5 H: p8 G# i# t& j流道设计与进浇口位置除了关系到充填时间的长短,更直接影响充填是否平衡。充填如果时间过长, 会导致产品生产速度过慢,造成成本提高;而充填不平均,会使往后保压、冷却阶段无法发挥其功效,造 成收缩不均与应力集中等问题发生,导致产品质量不佳。本研究利用 Moldex3D 模流分析软件仿真后,得知 流道的设计以直线型的流道较为优异,充填时间较 S 型流道节省约 20%。而采用较佳的进浇口设计可使得 翘曲变形量约减 40%。! _% {/ K" S, E+ b' C
9 P! s6 P/ Z+ U" m8 H$ Y% z! k英文摘要
% i: F N+ l ~* [7 r3 D1 lBesides filling duration, runner design and gate location matter a lot to flow balance as well. Longer filling time will lengthen production cycle time and further increase the cost; unbalanced flow will decrease the effect of packing and cooling, cause uneven shrinkage and stress concentration, and result in bad product quality. In this study, a CAE simulation tool, Moldex3D, is applied to investigate if the runner design and gate location are appropriate to the product. Through the simulation result, it shows the material in a linear runner will be saved by/ r u/ W$ ] B# J2 \
20% than the original S-shaped one; moreover, an optimized gate location will contribute 40% reduction of warpage.
! U3 o. X' m w* ]" a4 w$ l
" T9 T% P' h1 R+ H& V' _关键词: 流道、进浇口、Moldex3D、充填、翘曲。) d( V C! w" f2 s( Z- L1 ?
|
|