|
镜框流道设计与进浇位置之仿真分析
8 w5 U" t" V& v& p) Y6 ^, PSimulation of the runner and gate design for eyeglass frame
6 e: i9 T: m. J' u# ]* N( D- h
3 H8 ^1 Y+ x% }; S
3 Z, A) r) u4 d$ d% j4 E刘佳营 、萧宏玮 、杜秋慧 、萧乃仁4 u- I+ C; j: D! s$ Z
Chia-Ying Liu1,Hung-Wei Hsiao1 , Chiu-Hui Tu 2 , Nai-ren Hsiao3
5 j& T5 O4 }$ {
1 l- I8 t6 m5 o" N' _4 L7 T! l Q$ Y1 南台科技大学机械工程系副教授
& N, W4 H0 {7 T$ h4 [# JDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University3 z: N9 e% ]1 A9 y5 z* @9 z4 i
2 南台科技大学机械工程系研究生/ _: n3 E- T0 }% W/ y* b
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University" @0 B# T0 C2 `" W( U4 f- d; ^
3 中华医事科技大学职业安全卫生系讲师4 {) b! _. o7 w- U. s; |$ Z" ^
Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology0 n& r' v$ d# z
4 科盛科技股份有限公司 Core Tech System Co., Ltd( b E' Z3 Y1 y
9 S: t- t4 p* w! P$ Z! Y2 B. Z
中文摘要! E; a" z6 i4 E, C) _( Y S' _" ^
流道设计与进浇口位置除了关系到充填时间的长短,更直接影响充填是否平衡。充填如果时间过长, 会导致产品生产速度过慢,造成成本提高;而充填不平均,会使往后保压、冷却阶段无法发挥其功效,造 成收缩不均与应力集中等问题发生,导致产品质量不佳。本研究利用 Moldex3D 模流分析软件仿真后,得知 流道的设计以直线型的流道较为优异,充填时间较 S 型流道节省约 20%。而采用较佳的进浇口设计可使得 翘曲变形量约减 40%。
4 O# t& z2 G0 E; j1 _& E2 w0 e! Y! d
英文摘要
7 c# B/ S: L0 A2 cBesides filling duration, runner design and gate location matter a lot to flow balance as well. Longer filling time will lengthen production cycle time and further increase the cost; unbalanced flow will decrease the effect of packing and cooling, cause uneven shrinkage and stress concentration, and result in bad product quality. In this study, a CAE simulation tool, Moldex3D, is applied to investigate if the runner design and gate location are appropriate to the product. Through the simulation result, it shows the material in a linear runner will be saved by
1 X7 O+ T3 v; `( {) X' N+ |20% than the original S-shaped one; moreover, an optimized gate location will contribute 40% reduction of warpage.
1 Z B* x& X) T2 C* y# C8 E% ?4 Q$ L8 m3 L( ^7 [# _6 a
关键词: 流道、进浇口、Moldex3D、充填、翘曲。
0 j& d8 a4 x9 J: F1 R/ C |
|