|
镜框流道设计与进浇位置之仿真分析: R' o5 k+ a/ m" M
Simulation of the runner and gate design for eyeglass frame
4 T, u# ` Y* I7 w% `" A7 B. n: ^" S% D Z/ W* b7 |" d5 D
5 d* @$ l& J. l& b. j, G
刘佳营 、萧宏玮 、杜秋慧 、萧乃仁
/ f T! |- o1 \. gChia-Ying Liu1,Hung-Wei Hsiao1 , Chiu-Hui Tu 2 , Nai-ren Hsiao3
% w9 @4 X2 x8 {$ n* Q3 g) L# a1 t! c% {% y$ c1 V4 B; L* J
1 南台科技大学机械工程系副教授9 X! g2 |/ c* [$ M* H2 n
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University3 N' E' m X' W0 w9 l9 E
2 南台科技大学机械工程系研究生
, ?. i/ [4 j8 h" @7 P K. h( HDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University1 B+ @5 B" V" A- u1 F
3 中华医事科技大学职业安全卫生系讲师 _* l4 S' Z* Q
Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology
- ^ N( Q4 u- B; P w3 W4 J4 科盛科技股份有限公司 Core Tech System Co., Ltd Y4 C9 H+ s5 s0 q
( ^. r% R1 P8 @5 u2 B5 I) O6 S& Z
中文摘要- A$ x' t! E' Q% U' \# ^2 d0 f# u
流道设计与进浇口位置除了关系到充填时间的长短,更直接影响充填是否平衡。充填如果时间过长, 会导致产品生产速度过慢,造成成本提高;而充填不平均,会使往后保压、冷却阶段无法发挥其功效,造 成收缩不均与应力集中等问题发生,导致产品质量不佳。本研究利用 Moldex3D 模流分析软件仿真后,得知 流道的设计以直线型的流道较为优异,充填时间较 S 型流道节省约 20%。而采用较佳的进浇口设计可使得 翘曲变形量约减 40%。 j% \; ]7 n1 q. i
1 d& X8 z! ?# Y# Q
英文摘要0 _9 x0 k- p; }) W, H. g
Besides filling duration, runner design and gate location matter a lot to flow balance as well. Longer filling time will lengthen production cycle time and further increase the cost; unbalanced flow will decrease the effect of packing and cooling, cause uneven shrinkage and stress concentration, and result in bad product quality. In this study, a CAE simulation tool, Moldex3D, is applied to investigate if the runner design and gate location are appropriate to the product. Through the simulation result, it shows the material in a linear runner will be saved by
( v) i! K9 n1 I* l" `20% than the original S-shaped one; moreover, an optimized gate location will contribute 40% reduction of warpage.
4 {+ s* u6 U6 i' {# r. O
3 y4 t7 R! _: u) R1 d9 Z关键词: 流道、进浇口、Moldex3D、充填、翘曲。/ v3 Q- H$ f! Y: t9 t& T
|
|