|
镜框流道设计与进浇位置之仿真分析
8 o8 V7 y. J# V) { fSimulation of the runner and gate design for eyeglass frame6 ]9 K1 U5 m6 F8 N: s1 B- P
' S% N. t% [1 ]/ O6 {
: i! T5 B% f% J" h. I刘佳营 、萧宏玮 、杜秋慧 、萧乃仁1 t$ N+ |8 Y; u6 `
Chia-Ying Liu1,Hung-Wei Hsiao1 , Chiu-Hui Tu 2 , Nai-ren Hsiao3
" z" d3 ^, C2 O" G) Z* `
0 ?$ {( Y( O# o% ?. u1 南台科技大学机械工程系副教授. L% J4 c1 m# {2 _9 J7 M7 _) ]
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University$ p9 S! r2 m% Q: d$ N9 g
2 南台科技大学机械工程系研究生
0 U5 W7 u/ Z" |2 ?8 j( yDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University- Q0 M5 d$ E! r/ ~: T7 H8 q
3 中华医事科技大学职业安全卫生系讲师2 X' \( r L2 U0 L9 \/ |' ~1 z
Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology& J4 E1 v4 v3 E$ R8 Q# O. Y5 J) f
4 科盛科技股份有限公司 Core Tech System Co., Ltd% z; z9 P% k- F* M
4 U% v* ]3 @; c: R中文摘要
. M" z+ Y9 U# A) V3 k流道设计与进浇口位置除了关系到充填时间的长短,更直接影响充填是否平衡。充填如果时间过长, 会导致产品生产速度过慢,造成成本提高;而充填不平均,会使往后保压、冷却阶段无法发挥其功效,造 成收缩不均与应力集中等问题发生,导致产品质量不佳。本研究利用 Moldex3D 模流分析软件仿真后,得知 流道的设计以直线型的流道较为优异,充填时间较 S 型流道节省约 20%。而采用较佳的进浇口设计可使得 翘曲变形量约减 40%。& Q5 ^& h) \+ S j, b: ~
" y h3 X9 y8 u& i( ?% d* P! ]5 U
英文摘要
' T9 A1 \! y! Q2 O5 FBesides filling duration, runner design and gate location matter a lot to flow balance as well. Longer filling time will lengthen production cycle time and further increase the cost; unbalanced flow will decrease the effect of packing and cooling, cause uneven shrinkage and stress concentration, and result in bad product quality. In this study, a CAE simulation tool, Moldex3D, is applied to investigate if the runner design and gate location are appropriate to the product. Through the simulation result, it shows the material in a linear runner will be saved by) @: k/ \* @, F) v$ A1 e
20% than the original S-shaped one; moreover, an optimized gate location will contribute 40% reduction of warpage.
5 `0 ?, w. ]: \. w/ v
' r5 k8 @" E. j关键词: 流道、进浇口、Moldex3D、充填、翘曲。
# E' t# `5 z. i" z2 s. ` |
|