|
镜框流道设计与进浇位置之仿真分析
5 R% q2 W3 s, [+ ~$ LSimulation of the runner and gate design for eyeglass frame$ d' C6 s" n* E8 I. g T
' W. F8 O, b% O( V
* @" r! P% ?) G ?3 H
刘佳营 、萧宏玮 、杜秋慧 、萧乃仁& t F. f' d: p' s0 f6 o6 H
Chia-Ying Liu1,Hung-Wei Hsiao1 , Chiu-Hui Tu 2 , Nai-ren Hsiao3
/ Z2 c9 b4 G: m* B+ N: [4 \2 \. K- T: A1 K
1 南台科技大学机械工程系副教授+ O$ y* d0 o; n2 Y1 t3 ~
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University
% Q8 d* G" M+ l" `- g( L0 f) _7 [2 南台科技大学机械工程系研究生
3 g6 W0 |- f; H% G9 xDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University% U: K, @ K3 I7 t% D
3 中华医事科技大学职业安全卫生系讲师4 G9 T: K8 W& M1 p* l5 e2 U
Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology
- q& I+ f2 ~' u2 ?4 科盛科技股份有限公司 Core Tech System Co., Ltd
3 C5 p; K" v x- `5 @8 X+ {' R* _' w+ T+ e, O2 O# c( w3 j- p
中文摘要. [6 l7 H t0 l& R
流道设计与进浇口位置除了关系到充填时间的长短,更直接影响充填是否平衡。充填如果时间过长, 会导致产品生产速度过慢,造成成本提高;而充填不平均,会使往后保压、冷却阶段无法发挥其功效,造 成收缩不均与应力集中等问题发生,导致产品质量不佳。本研究利用 Moldex3D 模流分析软件仿真后,得知 流道的设计以直线型的流道较为优异,充填时间较 S 型流道节省约 20%。而采用较佳的进浇口设计可使得 翘曲变形量约减 40%。$ H# X0 Z* y& y3 S& E
( K% A! u% I7 g2 [: E) m4 o1 @英文摘要: B+ x5 N! x$ I. O5 H
Besides filling duration, runner design and gate location matter a lot to flow balance as well. Longer filling time will lengthen production cycle time and further increase the cost; unbalanced flow will decrease the effect of packing and cooling, cause uneven shrinkage and stress concentration, and result in bad product quality. In this study, a CAE simulation tool, Moldex3D, is applied to investigate if the runner design and gate location are appropriate to the product. Through the simulation result, it shows the material in a linear runner will be saved by1 I: I* S8 [" s7 U8 w; G" w* V
20% than the original S-shaped one; moreover, an optimized gate location will contribute 40% reduction of warpage.
$ J( k4 u8 m, D c- p3 G+ Y
7 k' {5 E+ }1 A8 N关键词: 流道、进浇口、Moldex3D、充填、翘曲。
9 ^% u' S: d8 D |
|