|
镜框流道设计与进浇位置之仿真分析
/ t) F4 V4 H; G. nSimulation of the runner and gate design for eyeglass frame
0 r' v& G5 p$ l- J& U* m- x! T& ^
, j) L# c! O- r, `8 m5 J3 x
刘佳营 、萧宏玮 、杜秋慧 、萧乃仁
8 J4 w+ }6 I! b- IChia-Ying Liu1,Hung-Wei Hsiao1 , Chiu-Hui Tu 2 , Nai-ren Hsiao34 Q9 v% W2 ?' e+ K
5 J4 o1 r1 z$ K7 M4 g5 |9 ?
1 南台科技大学机械工程系副教授
& l* S ~: `2 k4 \0 @Department of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University
, S4 z0 v1 F2 U" s0 d2 |- {2 南台科技大学机械工程系研究生
1 `4 i. I- D4 P: ?$ sDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University' P7 _) N d3 \, w. ~6 p
3 中华医事科技大学职业安全卫生系讲师" ]( i: R s/ F- |$ D/ @. Y+ A
Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology4 [+ a6 J% c' `% b, G7 ^
4 科盛科技股份有限公司 Core Tech System Co., Ltd
; E6 L! i) G3 } r6 q/ l8 r1 }' Q, `0 P8 e3 n) }4 A
中文摘要' U4 d! z$ Z) K( g
流道设计与进浇口位置除了关系到充填时间的长短,更直接影响充填是否平衡。充填如果时间过长, 会导致产品生产速度过慢,造成成本提高;而充填不平均,会使往后保压、冷却阶段无法发挥其功效,造 成收缩不均与应力集中等问题发生,导致产品质量不佳。本研究利用 Moldex3D 模流分析软件仿真后,得知 流道的设计以直线型的流道较为优异,充填时间较 S 型流道节省约 20%。而采用较佳的进浇口设计可使得 翘曲变形量约减 40%。
. x4 n$ n! Y; k# X; w L1 ^
' W% T, X' j2 u/ [: {英文摘要1 k( x, B4 E a+ f* ]/ l& m! N0 k1 a
Besides filling duration, runner design and gate location matter a lot to flow balance as well. Longer filling time will lengthen production cycle time and further increase the cost; unbalanced flow will decrease the effect of packing and cooling, cause uneven shrinkage and stress concentration, and result in bad product quality. In this study, a CAE simulation tool, Moldex3D, is applied to investigate if the runner design and gate location are appropriate to the product. Through the simulation result, it shows the material in a linear runner will be saved by$ y `- a( w( E' p5 [+ W
20% than the original S-shaped one; moreover, an optimized gate location will contribute 40% reduction of warpage.
; P I h* w3 b7 z8 L! I
6 G' \7 y5 r5 N! m) o! k3 \关键词: 流道、进浇口、Moldex3D、充填、翘曲。 P+ u" o3 b. [' H) b2 Q
|
|