|
镜框流道设计与进浇位置之仿真分析
5 q4 F& S0 I% h. V' _% }Simulation of the runner and gate design for eyeglass frame" B) S U- E* q6 C0 r6 O$ h
0 u6 z6 z1 O$ Q5 u2 n) g) C) t) `' c0 p
刘佳营 、萧宏玮 、杜秋慧 、萧乃仁
8 {3 y6 _% S3 s3 s, @: d* PChia-Ying Liu1,Hung-Wei Hsiao1 , Chiu-Hui Tu 2 , Nai-ren Hsiao3, a1 X5 o/ N$ Y/ N0 p
$ b7 x+ i1 i J
1 南台科技大学机械工程系副教授6 e% }' }+ D( g
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University
; Q+ y: `5 h0 s. m/ m! ~: {2 南台科技大学机械工程系研究生4 R! X4 T5 h5 N9 y$ D& i, K
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University0 s% v" U5 h) f+ g
3 中华医事科技大学职业安全卫生系讲师
: i7 Y' b* v. B/ _8 D ?Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology) v6 O1 O! s2 `; P' V8 }
4 科盛科技股份有限公司 Core Tech System Co., Ltd2 m* q: M8 F! V: n' `9 K' v
" `0 W, d# i& k- O c8 L; [
中文摘要
0 v2 |" h$ J2 Y2 m! T流道设计与进浇口位置除了关系到充填时间的长短,更直接影响充填是否平衡。充填如果时间过长, 会导致产品生产速度过慢,造成成本提高;而充填不平均,会使往后保压、冷却阶段无法发挥其功效,造 成收缩不均与应力集中等问题发生,导致产品质量不佳。本研究利用 Moldex3D 模流分析软件仿真后,得知 流道的设计以直线型的流道较为优异,充填时间较 S 型流道节省约 20%。而采用较佳的进浇口设计可使得 翘曲变形量约减 40%。
& p+ g) d& {/ s7 K* }& e1 h$ K" H0 t7 D Q, L8 y8 o2 |
英文摘要
6 l% {+ D1 W) x, F/ A& fBesides filling duration, runner design and gate location matter a lot to flow balance as well. Longer filling time will lengthen production cycle time and further increase the cost; unbalanced flow will decrease the effect of packing and cooling, cause uneven shrinkage and stress concentration, and result in bad product quality. In this study, a CAE simulation tool, Moldex3D, is applied to investigate if the runner design and gate location are appropriate to the product. Through the simulation result, it shows the material in a linear runner will be saved by
7 H- _8 S Q! x5 M20% than the original S-shaped one; moreover, an optimized gate location will contribute 40% reduction of warpage.) |% W: e `& Q: u. @( u J, `
; [ [0 m# a: ]1 [) w% R) o关键词: 流道、进浇口、Moldex3D、充填、翘曲。
1 Q2 ]' ?1 t* ^( F2 f |
|