青华模具培训学校

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

青华模具培训学院
查看: 6267|回复: 19

用HeidenHain的CYCL19加工的注意了。

[复制链接]
发表于 2008-8-26 20:22 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
我在做后置时发现,在说明书中,CYCL19三个轴的旋转顺序,说明书(英文)在468页倒数第二段说的是先A,再B,最后才是C。可是,我们的机床验正后,却是先C,再B,最后才是A。会不会是说明书有问题。
1 ?: ~' X  S& p$ g
8 F+ ~8 E( |6 f8 s  ?[ 本帖最后由 ylzstudio 于 2008-8-26 20:24 编辑 ]
发表于 2008-8-26 23:09 | 显示全部楼层
是啊,验证都是先C后A才正确。
发表于 2008-8-31 00:46 | 显示全部楼层

回复 2楼 liquid11 的帖子

tilt according to splindle axis first ,then rotatary axis, depending on your machine configuration .For example if your machine rotate "a"  is the axis that control the z axis from vertical to horizontal, it will read this first. i hope
+ j2 r8 F7 U# j% ji am correct.
发表于 2008-9-3 15:58 | 显示全部楼层
这个应该就是主动轴和从动轴的问题吧
发表于 2008-9-7 13:57 | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 cch 于 2008-8-31 00:46 发表
$ X# m# Y- \) p7 `4 ~# Ltilt according to splindle axis first ,then rotatary axis, depending on your machine configuration .For example if your machine rotate "a"  is the axis that control the z axis from vertical to horizon ...
2 ^" `. r8 I' s" S! O
事实上我们用UG编程必须先验证旋转轴C才正确,其他无法和UG一样,而且机器在读程序时候,A,C总是同时出现的,也是一起转的,还有我编的程序也在机床上验证正确了。还有请你用国语,看了你的英文很累。
发表于 2008-9-10 12:29 | 显示全部楼层
顶!
发表于 2008-9-16 23:41 | 显示全部楼层

回复 5楼 liquid11 的帖子

i am sorry i only know how to write in english. A axis is turn around in  x axis.B axis is turn around  in y axis.C axis is turn around in z axis. Only rotate A or B will affect the Z axis angle.That why, in program only  can see G80A??C?? or G80B??C??.For example G80A90C180 & G80A-90C0 .The machine tilted the splindle head from vertical to horizontal without rotate the C table, the only different is  X+ become  X- &  Y+ become Y-, for Z remain the same.Above mention is only tested on tilting head machine only(DMU series).
发表于 2008-9-26 04:21 | 显示全部楼层
用 CYCL DEF 19 并不保证100%安全, PLANE VECTOR才是最好的3+2定位。
0 d# u+ }3 _* Y' Y下面是openmind的解释
" E3 S; ?: ~1 e6 {3 B. W
; E' E+ Z. M) X% tWhen using angles, the error I´m talking about can happen, but not necessarily all the time.  One situation could be fine, another, not; it is up to the frame.  Example: when there is a frame which is only rotated 1 deg or 0.5 deg around one single axis [X or Y] the result, most likely, will be ok.  However, for another frame that is rotated several times around several axes, all by 0.xxx degrees, the risk that the workplane angles contain a little deviation is obvious.
发表于 2008-9-26 04:22 | 显示全部楼层
用 CYCL DEF 19 并不保证100%安全, PLANE VECTOR才是最好的3+2定位。5 ^& E" {9 |) T' D* x3 R2 s
下面是openmind的解释
9 I# I5 M& K+ ~) A" p6 L
) F4 h: }$ ?; p8 d9 \When using angles, the error I´m talking about can happen, but not necessarily all the time.  One situation could be fine, another, not; it is up to the frame.  Example: when there is a frame which is only rotated 1 deg or 0.5 deg around one single axis [X or Y] the result, most likely, will be ok.  However, for another frame that is rotated several times around several axes, all by 0.xxx degrees, the risk that the workplane angles contain a little deviation is obvious.
发表于 2008-9-26 04:23 | 显示全部楼层
用 CYCL DEF 19 并不保证100%安全, PLANE VECTOR才是最好的3+2定位。
( I0 O1 v  Q1 P- b8 M2 q下面是openmind的解释, p6 v& d8 ]3 f5 d1 {0 {3 ^6 r; }3 b
When using angles, the error I´m talking about can happen, but not necessarily all the time.  One situation could be fine, another, not; it is up to the frame.  Example: when there is a frame which is only rotated 1 deg or 0.5 deg around one single axis [X or Y] the result, most likely, will be ok.  However, for another frame that is rotated several times around several axes, all by 0.xxx degrees, the risk that the workplane angles contain a little deviation is obvious.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|关于我们|sitemap|小黑屋|Archiver|手机版|UG网-UG技术论坛-青华数控模具培训学校 ( 粤ICP备15108561号 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-24 20:09 , Processed in 0.052502 second(s), 25 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表