用HeidenHain的CYCL19加工的注意了。

YEFU88 · 发表于 2008-9-26 04:24

用 CYCL DEF 19 并不保证100%安全， PLANE VECTOR才是最好的3+2定位。
下面是openmind的解释
When using angles, the error I´m talking about can happen, but not necessarily all the time. One situation could be fine, another, not; it is up to the frame. Example: when there is a frame which is only rotated 1 deg or 0.5 deg around one single axis [X or Y] the result, most likely, will be ok. However, for another frame that is rotated several times around several axes, all by 0.xxx degrees, the risk that the workplane angles contain a little deviation is obvious.

cch · 发表于 2008-9-30 10:01

You are saying the machine specification, some m/c with a accuracy of 2.5 ,1 or 0.5 degrees per index on spinldle or table rotation, but from what i known 3+2 axis is not a full 5 axis m/c due to above mention. For example for DMU Series G19 A-20 B10.0 C0 is possible to actitvate it by tilting the spindle 20 degrees with a rotation on c axis( table) inorder to make a rotation on ZX plane by 10 degrees and this is being calculate by
m/c himself. It is exactly the same as Fanuc G68 X0Y0Z0 R-20.0 I1.0J0K0; G68X0Y0Z0R10.0I0J1.0K0; I means
the concept.

ylzstudio · 发表于 2008-10-14 11:40

坐标的轴的旋转，各机床轴的旋转是不一样的，坐标轴的旋转是坐标变换的范围，坐标变换步骤是一样的，但顺序不一样，得到的结果就不一样。
CYCL DEF 19.0 WORKING PLANE
CYCL DEF 19.1A+30 B+15 C-225
L C+Q122 B+Q121 R0 F MAX
可能都是上面的三句，但机床系统坐标变换的顺序不一样，结果就不同。

skyhall02 · 发表于 2009-3-27 22:18

角度都是一样的，只是换了个马甲，另外顺序换了

期望听雨 · 发表于 2009-4-3 00:56

hchdxq · 发表于 2009-4-5 20:42

如果用cycl19，ABC的顺序非常重要，要改写系统提供的算法。

pzhlsx · 发表于 2009-6-1 21:39

强烈支持，10楼的同志，PLANE VECTOR才是最好的3+2定位，，我同意，本人用了10年的五轴，总结呀，

cxx · 发表于 2009-6-2 16:42

本帖最后由 cxx 于 2009-6-2 16:43 编辑

HeidenHain的系统功能是非常强大的，找到合适当前加工工艺的才是最好的
不能要求某个功能解决现实加工中所有的问题

wuping1972 · 发表于 2012-4-16 12:55

学习一下

bobofly123 · 发表于 2012-4-16 13:10

那把旋转顺序改了应该就不会出错了把~

		自动登录	找回密码
密码			注册

用HeidenHain的CYCL19加工的注意了。

回复 10楼 YEFU88 的帖子

浏览过的版块